About

President of the Board of the Polish Free and Open Source Software Foundation. Human rights in digital era hacktivist, Free Software advocate, privacy and anonimity evangelist; expert volunteer to the Panoptykon Foundation; co-organizer of SocHack social hackathons; charter member of the Warsaw Hackerspace; and Telecomix co-operator; biker, sailor.

Formerly CTO of BRAMA Mobile Technologies Laboratory on Warsaw University of Technology and a student at Philosophy Institute on Warsaw University.

Former affiliations

BRAMA Lab BRAMA Lab

Table of Contents

05.06.2013Libel Culture104 17.05.2013Why I find -ND unnecessary and harmful101 11.02.2013One year anniversary of Anti-ACTA97 30.01.2013Fighting Black PR around OER95 29.01.2013HOWTO: effectively argue against Internet censorship ideas94 20.11.2012Border conditions for preserving subjectivity in the digital era93 19.11.2012Social blogosphere92 07.11.2012Embrace fragmentation91 02.11.2012SERVICES.TXT90 24.10.2012Apple finally jumped the shark89 24.09.2012Breaking the garden walls88 24.09.2012Melbourne CryptoParty video message86 16.09.2012On sailor's sensitivity, or "the starry heavens above me"85 22.08.2012Black PR around Polish e-Textbooks84 24.07.2012Hypochristian Love82 24.07.2012Some new Layout Goodness81 17.07.2012Party 2.080 13.07.2012Party as a system hack78 10.06.2012Are corporations dangerous only in collusion with governments?77 09.06.2012Proxies! Proxies everywhere!76 04.06.2012Automagic re-publishing from Twitter to StatusNet75 18.05.2012TPSA/Orange and GIMP, or a word on 5 users74 05.04.2012Perfect ToDo-oid71 27.03.2012Subjectively on Anti-ACTA in Poland70 25.03.2012On copyright in Budapest69 20.03.2012Learning to Internet67 29.02.2012Brussels Safari #1 - EP press conference and ITRE65 21.02.2012Because ACTA is passé64 20.02.2012Privacy of correspondence, EU-style63 17.02.2012Polish PM on ACTA: I was wrong62 12.02.2012Anonymous vs Corponymous61 10.02.2012To have a cookie and dowload it too60 19.01.2012About ACTA at Polish PM Chancellery59 19.01.2012Free as in United58 10.01.2012Terms of Using the Service56 05.01.2012Corporate lack of patriotism55 04.01.2012Terroristcopters54 02.01.2012IceWeasel and Privacy53 28.12.2011Good Uncle Stal... Putin52 25.12.2011Useful Bash defaults done right51 21.12.2011Google Mail, or how mail becomes publication50 20.12.2011Occupy Gotham49 11.12.2011Copyfraud48 18.11.2011One-way cutting45 11.11.2011Users and Citizens43 30.10.2011Adhocracy and Net4Change42 18.10.2011War on Fun41 14.10.2011Technocomplacency39 09.10.2011Election Silence in Poland38 02.10.2011E-textbooks, Johnny Mnemonic, business and the Net35 12.09.2011Diaspora-Based Comment System31 11.09.2011Conflict of values30 06.09.2011On-line privacy and anonymity: case in point28 04.09.2011On being careful with words27 29.08.2011Of malware, hot steam, privacy, using one's brain and paedoparanoia24 29.08.2011Kragen Thinking Out Loud23 26.07.2011Willpower, productivity and cycling 20 18.07.2011Neo FreeRunner as a WiFi Soundcard19 10.07.2011A Weekend with lawyers18 09.07.2011One step closer to ideal17 04.07.2011Apostasy in Poland16 28.06.2011YAFR (Yet Another Facebook Rant)15 17.06.2011Important meetings, fun meetings13 13.06.2011Ooops I12 30.05.2011Playing with Node.js11 25.05.2011Mozilla, Google and the Location Bar10 24.05.2011At Sector 3.0 conf9 22.05.2011Layout, CSS and RSS/Atom8 15.05.2011Startup Weekend Network Fun Fun Fun7 10.05.2011World's Smallest Open Source Violin5 06.05.2011I can has brag1

Learning to Internet

en pl txt

The Internet is a very young invention — its precursor, ARPANET, was created in the early 70s. Most of Internet phenomena we partake in and tools we use are much younger. First social networks, for example, were created in the nineties, however the boom for the came only in the first decade of the 21st century.

That means, basically, that we do not know how to use them. Simply put, we had no time to learn.

People, naturally, are trying to work in the new reality, in new situations, with new technology by analogy to situations and technologies they know. Only after such practical attempts (often lasting for years) does the understanding of how the new tool differs from the old and well known ones arise. And with that — new regulations, new customs ordering up the use of such new technology.

Car Analogy

When first "automobiles" showed up, they were treated more or less as carriages, a technology known for ages. It soon, however, turned out that cars are much faster and hence much more dangerous; this lead to new customs and laws, and a whole new culture of using cars, that accounted for the "otherness" of this new tool and new reality.

At first, part of the regulations was absurd. For instance, red flag laws stating that each "mechanical carriage" should be preceded by a person with a flag or lantern, warning about machine's approach. With time, though, people learned how to use cars, and how to regulate its use — and the new tool gradually stopped being new.

Finally, the tool became familiar, cars are now an ordinary part of everyday life; we all more or less know and understand the rules — like having to look around while crossing the street or using seatbelts while in a car. Some of such rules entered common knowledge and customs; some were made into laws. In general we all know how to behave in a world with cars — something our grandparents knew not.

Information Superhighway

With Internet, social media and the rest of the information technologies (called quite recently — unsurprisingly — "new technologies"), we are in a similar situation to our forefathers in the first years of motorisation. The technology changed, and it changed our reality. We do not know and are unable to foresee all consequences of our actions in the virtual space. Rules, the culture of using the Internet and laws pertaining to it — are only being created.

In many ways our situation is actually much worse. Technology changes much faster than these few decades ago; this means that it's much harder to catch up with cultural changes, with customs and regulations. It gets even worse: possible ill effects of our inability to foresee all consequences of certain actions are significantly delayed and not as spectacular, as consequences of not noticing a car approaching (although not always).

Hence, it's harder for us to notice such ill effects, take them into account and verify or change our customs, our internet hygiene. If consequences of my bad decision turn out only 5 years from now on some job interview I fail due to some pictures from a party, published 2 years ago — during these 7 years I am unaware of the fact that putting those pictures on-line was a mistake. And there is a huge chance I will make this mistake many, many times during this time.

Not only does the technology change faster than ever, we are reacting to those changes (through making changes to our customs, culture, laws) slower than before. This is extremely dangerous — but we will make notice of it 5 or 10 years from now, when today's teens will be trying to get their first jobs, while their prospective employers will verify them with the help from Uncle Google and Big Brother Facebook.

Red flags

This is precisely the reason why some organisations and people (including myself) are warning about giving up privacy (of which citizens are not always aware), about giving our personal data and private communication away to corporations and centralized networks.

It is, of course, possible that we are overreacting — like the proponents of "red flag" laws. However, it is often better to be a bit overcautious — so that we're not all engulfed in technocomplacency and blind fascination over new technologies.